Some people would criticize Utilitarianism by saying it was
a godless doctrine. The reason for this claim in the simple fact that people
believe that Utilitarianism focuses on the mere happiness of humans, and not
the will of God. Kant responded by saying Utilitarianism was probably the most
godly doctrine, depending on one’s idea of God. Kant believes that if God wants
his creation to be happy and not suffer, then Utilitarianism was made in line
with God. Utilitarianism is aimed to promote the most happiness for the
greatest amount of people possible. If you worship a god that wants you to act
in such a way that produces happiness to other people, then you are actually
doing God’s will by being a Utilitarian.
In this instance, I strongly agree with Kant’s statement
that disagrees with this certain objection with Utilitarianism. The Christian
Bible portrays God as a wrathful and powerful being. Although he is seen to be
intimidating, he also is made out to be a caring God that watches over the well
being of his people. The Christian God wants his people to be happy, so I
believe a Utilitarian lifestyle would fit someone that also claims to be a
Christian. I also believe that this idea would apply to most religions. In
other religions, their God or Goddess is usually portrayed as a being that
cares about their people and wants them to thrive the best they can on their
own. In my opinion, a lot of people would not want to worship a God that does
not want their followers to be as happy as they could be. Overall, I think that
Kant’s argument for the fact that Utilitarian is a godly doctrine is a very
valid argument. After all, why would a God want their own creation to be
miserable?
I agree with the position that it is the most religious doctrine. God does want people to do good, which is exactly what the utilitarianism idea does for people. I also liked that you included the idea of other religions and their higher powers in how they would want their people happy just as other powers would want. Your post explained the objection of being Godless in a very good way.
ReplyDelete