Justice should be blind, not ignorant.
There are so many aspects of our discussions on the nature
of Justice buzzing around in my head that I had trouble deciding which buzz
would become a blogpost. One of the things that stuck out in my mind and really
rubbed me the wrong way was Cephalus’ idea that justice meant paying one’s
debts. That gives me the idea that
Cephalus had made some money or gleaned some support from being a merchant or
by being involved in trade of some sort.
It seemed so narrow minded, even from the perspective of his time. Surely, he had to be aware that there were
lenders who overcharged interest, and merchants who cheated customers. Wouldn’t it be unjust to pay one’s debt to an
unscrupulous business owner? Justice is still viewed as payment of a debt,
however, particularly in our judicial system. We often speak of released
convicts having “paid their debt to society.” But can you buy justice? And if
it is bought, does it remain just?
The comment attributed to Cephalus sounded so much like
something that might have been said by a southern plantation owner in the
antebellum south, biased and ignorant. If it works from his point of view, why
should he bother with anyone else’s? Unfortunately, groups of ignorant people
often band together to come to their own conclusions about justice. Justice
seems so intertwined in the idea of consensus.
But a consensus does not justice make. Ask the two sisters in India who
are in hiding because a village tribunal decided that they should be raped
because their brother ran off with the wrong woman. Of course the rest of the
world has reached a different consensus about that tribunal’s idea of justice.
I like to hope that justice is something beyond the point of
view or opinion of any of us, but that we all have a seed of it planted within
us. A cosmic ideal that we can nurture
or neglect, and when nurtured, gives us a little tug when it recognizes the
seeds of justice in the actions of others. We have this image of Justice the Goddess,
greater than any of us, with her scales to weigh consequences, and her
blindfold to help her judge all equally.
But perhaps her blindfold is a reminder that we can’t see justice if we
only seek it from our own narrow point of view.
Richard Dawkins' book "The God Delusion" presents a problem with the way the seed of justice in us can be altered. He explains an experiment conducted by John Hartung. Hartung presented the battle of Jericho to Israeli schoolchildren and asked if Joshua was acting in a rational way. Tinted by religion, as young as 8, children took defense for people of their same faith. Hartung then presented the same story but replaced the religious cities with other cities and biblical names with names that could be associated to a "Chinese kingdom". This way kids gave radically different answers, untainted by their forced on religious views. In my opinion, we should be as open minded as possible. We should also question things and look at them from as many vantages as possible to get as fair of any answer as possible.
ReplyDeleteTrue Justice can be obtained, but only once we deliberate as to what justice is based on the universal understanding written in the depths of our beings. Left to lawmakers and individuals, it is possible for justice to become colored by the varying priorities people have.